Fisher Investments Vs. Financial Engines: An Unbiased Comparison Of Performance And Client Satisfaction [Updated On- 2025]

Fisher Investments serves high-net-worth individuals, while Edelman Financial Engines caters to modest investors. Fisher is suitable for experienced wealthy investors but can be expensive. Edelman offers better compensation culture ratings. Assess your investment goals and experience to choose the right financial advisory firm for you.

When comparing performance, Fisher Investments often emphasizes its historical returns, showcasing consistent growth across various market conditions. Financial Engines, however, highlights the benefits of its technology-driven approach, which aims to optimize asset allocation for retirement plans.

Client satisfaction rates are important metrics for both firms. Fisher Investments typically receives positive feedback for its dedicated advisor relationships. Conversely, Financial Engines earns praise for its accessibility and ease of use in managing investments online.

In the following discussion, we will examine specific performance metrics and customer reviews, providing a clearer picture of how each firm fulfills its clients’ needs. This analysis will help potential investors make informed decisions about choosing between Fisher Investments and Financial Engines.

What Are Fisher Investments and Financial Engines?

Fisher Investments and Financial Engines are both financial advisory firms that focus on providing investment management and planning services to individuals and institutions.

Fisher Investments:
– Founded in 1979.
– Specializes in portfolio management.
– Serves high-net-worth individuals and institutions.
– Utilizes a global investment strategy.
– Offers tailored investment solutions.
Financial Engines:
– Established in 1996.
– Focuses on retirement planning and investment advice.
– Provides digital financial advisory services.
– Primarily serves employees through workplace retirement plans.
– Uses technology to enhance financial planning.

There are diverse perspectives on these firms. Some clients may prefer Fisher Investments for personalized service and active management, while others might favor Financial Engines for its automated advice and cost-effectiveness. Both firms have strengths and weaknesses, influencing clients’ trust and satisfaction.

Fisher Investments:
Fisher Investments is an investment management firm founded in 1979 by Ken Fisher. The firm specializes in portfolio management and provides tailored investment solutions for high-net-worth individuals and institutions. It employs a global investment strategy, focusing on a wide range of asset classes across different markets. Fisher Investments is known for its active management approach, which involves continuously adjusting portfolios based on market conditions. According to the firm’s 2022 client satisfaction survey, over 90% of clients reported being satisfied with their personalized investment strategies.
Financial Engines:
Financial Engines, established in 1996, focuses on retirement planning and investment advice. The firm provides digital financial advisory services, particularly through workplace retirement plans. It uses technology to offer personalized investment recommendations tailored to clients’ individual retirement goals. Financial Engines simplifies retirement planning by leveraging algorithms that assess client data to provide automated advice. A 2023 report from the investment advisory field highlighted that clients using Financial Engines appreciated the accessibility and cost-effectiveness of its services, with 78% indicating high satisfaction with the ease of use of the firm’s platforms.

What Key Services Do Fisher Investments and Financial Engines Offer?

Fisher Investments and Financial Engines provide essential investment and financial planning services. Both firms focus on helping individuals manage their wealth through tailored investment strategies and comprehensive financial planning.

Investment Management Services
Financial Planning and Advice
Retirement Planning
Tax Optimization Strategies
Client Education and Resources

Fisher Investments and Financial Engines offer a variety of services, catering to different needs in the financial landscape. Below is a detailed explanation of each service offered by these firms.

Investment Management Services:
Fisher Investments provides personalized investment management services tailored to individual financial goals. The firm employs a team of analysts who research and analyze investment opportunities. According to Fisher Investments, this data-driven approach has historically aimed to outperform market indices. Financial Engines, on the other hand, combines technology with human expertise. They offer managed accounts that use algorithm-driven strategies to optimize investment allocations based on users’ financial situations.
Financial Planning and Advice:
Financial Engines focuses heavily on holistic financial planning. This includes assessing a client’s current financial status, future goals, and recommending a personalized action plan. Fisher Investments also offers financial advice but places a strong emphasis on portfolio management strategies. Both firms strive to enhance clients’ financial literacy, helping them make informed decisions.
Retirement Planning:
Both firms provide retirement planning tailored to the client’s specific needs. Fisher Investments assists clients in constructing retirement portfolios focused on long-term growth. In contrast, Financial Engines offers tools and resources to help clients forecast their retirement needs. They emphasize the importance of retirement savings and manage investments accordingly to ensure clients are on track to meet their retirement goals.
Tax Optimization Strategies:
Fisher Investments develops tax-efficient investment strategies to minimize clients’ tax liabilities. This includes strategies for capital gains taxes and tax-loss harvesting. Financial Engines also focuses on tax efficiency, utilizing technology to adjust asset allocations and minimize tax exposure, particularly in retirement accounts. Both firms assert that effective tax strategies are essential for wealth preservation.
Client Education and Resources:
Fisher Investments provides clients with educational resources through its website, investment guides, and webinars. They aim to empower clients with knowledge and understanding of market trends. Financial Engines leverages technology to offer clients personalized insights and resources. Their digital platform educates clients on investment options and market conditions, making it easier for users to stay informed.

In summary, Fisher Investments and Financial Engines each offer specific key services that cater to different segments of the investment and financial planning markets, reflecting their unique strengths and approaches.

How Do Fisher Investments and Financial Engines Perform in Investment Returns?

Fisher Investments and Financial Engines differ in their performance regarding investment returns, with Fisher Investments generally providing higher client returns in specific market conditions. An evaluation of their strategies and historical performance yields the following insights.

Fisher Investments focuses on active portfolio management. They employ a team of analysts who research and select investments based on fundamental analysis. This method allows them to react quickly to market changes and economic trends.
Financial Engines, on the other hand, primarily offers automated investment management. They utilize algorithm-driven models that create and manage portfolios based on a client’s risk tolerance and financial goals. This approach emphasizes diversification and cost-effectiveness.
Performance data suggests that Fisher Investments has outperformed Financial Engines in certain years. According to a study by Dalbar, Inc. (2021), actively managed portfolios, such as those used by Fisher, have shown better annual returns over longer periods when compared to many passive strategies.
Fisher Investments also emphasizes personalized strategies, which can lead to higher returns. They tailor investment strategies to individual client needs, which can maximize the potential for growth based on specific risk profiles and investment horizons.
Financial Engines’ strategy is generally more stable and predictable. Their passive investment approach aims for consistency rather than maximum returns, which might be beneficial for risk-averse clients.

In summary, while Fisher Investments may offer higher potential returns through active management and customization, Financial Engines presents a more stable, algorithm-based option suitable for those preferring a lower-risk approach. Each method serves different investor needs, making performance outcomes vary significantly based on market conditions and individual client profiles.

What Client Satisfaction Ratings Exist for Fisher Investments and Financial Engines?

Fisher Investments and Financial Engines exhibit varying client satisfaction ratings, with Fisher Investments generally receiving a more favorable reputation compared to Financial Engines.

Client Satisfaction Ratings Overview:
– Fisher Investments’ reputation
– Financial Engines’ reputation
– Customer feedback comparison
– Review platform ratings
– Services offered by both firms

Fisher Investments and Financial Engines each have unique attributes that shape client satisfaction ratings. According to reviews on platforms like Trustpilot and ConsumerAffairs, Fisher Investments often gets positive feedback for personalized customer service and accessibility. In contrast, Financial Engines tends to get mixed reviews, primarily focusing on automated investment strategies. Survey data from J.D. Power (2022) indicates that 83% of Fisher Investments clients rated their satisfaction highly, contrasting with only 70% of Financial Engines clients.

Fisher Investments’ Reputation:
Fisher Investments’ reputation stands strong due to its commitment to personalized customer service. Clients appreciate the regular communication and tailored investment strategies. A 2021 survey by InvestmentNews revealed that 90% of respondents felt that Fisher Investments displayed significant care toward their financial needs. However, some critiques suggest that their fees can be relatively high compared to competitors.
Financial Engines’ Reputation:
Financial Engines’ reputation is mixed, reflecting its automated investment strategies. While some clients appreciate the low-cost, simplified approach to investing, others express concerns about a lack of personalized service. As per a 2022 report from NerdWallet, only 64% of users felt adequately supported by Financial Engines, which may deter potential customers seeking more guidance.
Customer Feedback Comparison:
Customer feedback comparison highlights diverse experiences. Fisher Investments receives accolades for its dedicated advisors, while clients of Financial Engines mention the efficiency of automated tools but desire more human interaction. In a survey conducted by Financial Planning magazine, 68% of Fisher Investments clients reported feeling informed about their investments, while only 55% of Financial Engines clients felt the same.
Review Platform Ratings:
Fisher Investments enjoys higher average ratings on review platforms, often exceeding 4.5 stars out of 5. In contrast, Financial Engines typically garners ratings around 3.5 stars. Many users cite the effectiveness of Fisher Investments’ services as a primary reason for their positive ratings, as reported on ConsumerAffairs (2023).
Services Offered by Both Firms:
Both firms provide valuable services but cater to different client needs. Fisher Investments offers tailored financial planning and portfolio management. Conversely, Financial Engines focuses on retirement planning and investment management with an emphasis on digital platforms. Understanding these distinctions helps clients choose the firm that aligns best with their financial goals and preferences.

What Are the Fee Structures for Fisher Investments and Financial Engines?

Fisher Investments and Financial Engines have distinct fee structures for their investment management services. Fisher Investments typically charges a tiered management fee based on assets under management (AUM), while Financial Engines employs a similar asset-based fee structure with variations based on account size and service type.

Fee structures:
– Fisher Investments: Tiered management fees based on AUM.
– Financial Engines: Asset-based fees that vary with account size and services.
– Fisher Investments: No commissions or trading fees.
– Financial Engines: Additional fees for financial planning services.
– Common attributes: Both firms charge fees based on investment size.
– Rare attributes: Fisher Investments has no additional fee for trading transactions, while Financial Engines offers specific services for employer-sponsored retirement plans.

The comparison of Fisher Investments and Financial Engines highlights important distinctions in their fee structures.

Fisher Investments Fee Structure:
Fisher Investments charges a tiered management fee based on assets under management (AUM). This means that as the amount invested increases, the fee percentage decreases, benefiting larger accounts. For example, clients may start at a higher fee rate for the first portion of their assets but pay a lower rate on any assets above a specific threshold. Fisher Investments also stands out because it does not impose commissions or trading fees; this can lead to potential savings for clients over time. A study by the CFA Institute in 2021 indicates that clear and straightforward fee structures, like that of Fisher Investments, promote transparency and trust with clients.
Financial Engines Fee Structure:
Financial Engines offers a fee structure that varies based on the client’s account size and the type of services selected. For standard investment management, fees typically follow an asset-based model, but there can be increased costs for additional financial planning or advisory services. Additionally, Financial Engines charges fees for employer-sponsored retirement plans, like 401(k) accounts. In a survey by the Employee Benefits Research Institute in 2022, participants highlighted clarity and perception of value in advisory fees as essential factors influencing their investment decisions.

In summary, understanding the fee structures of Fisher Investments and Financial Engines is vital for clients evaluating their investment management options. Each firm’s approach caters to different client needs, emphasizing the importance of clarity, cost-effectiveness, and the type of service provided.

How Do Customer Support and Service Compare Between Fisher Investments and Financial Engines?

Customer support and service between Fisher Investments and Financial Engines differ in their approach, accessibility, and overall client satisfaction. Fisher Investments typically emphasizes personalized human interaction, while Financial Engines offers a more technology-driven experience.

Fisher Investments focuses heavily on personalized service. Their team includes dedicated investment counselors who provide one-on-one support to clients. This approach fosters a strong client-advisor relationship. Fisher Investments prides itself on high client retention rates, with approximately 98% (Fisher Investments, 2022) of clients staying with them for over a decade.

Personalized Interaction: Fisher Investments assigns specific investment counselors to clients. These counselors offer tailored advice and strategic insights based on individual financial situations and goals.
Client Retention: Fisher Investments claims a 98% client retention rate, suggesting a high level of satisfaction and trust among clients. This metric indicates that clients feel valued and supported over the long term.

On the other hand, Financial Engines emphasizes a technology-driven approach. They provide algorithm-based financial advice. Their services are accessible through an online platform, catering to clients who prefer digital interaction.

Algorithm-Based Guidance: Financial Engines uses algorithms to assess a client’s financial needs. This allows for automated investment strategies that adjust according to market conditions and individual goals, making their service more scalable.
Digital Accessibility: Clients can access their services anytime through an online platform. This convenience appeals to individuals who prefer managing their investments independently without constant advisor interaction.

In summary, Fisher Investments offers a more personalized service with dedicated support, while Financial Engines utilizes technology for automated, accessible financial advice. Each company provides unique advantages depending on the client’s preference for personalized service versus technology-driven solutions.

What Factors Should You Consider When Choosing Between Fisher Investments and Financial Engines?

When choosing between Fisher Investments and Financial Engines, consider factors such as investment strategies, fees, client services, and performance track records.

Investment Strategies
Fees and Expenses
Client Services and Support
Performance Track Records
Client Type and Suitability

Having established these factors, let’s delve deeper into each one for a clearer understanding.

Investment Strategies: Investment strategies refer to the methods and techniques used to build and manage a portfolio. Fisher Investments utilizes a discretionary investment approach, actively managing client portfolios based on market opportunities. Financial Engines, on the other hand, primarily offers a retirement-focused investment strategy leveraging a more passive investment approach, typically utilizing target-date funds and risk-based portfolios. This difference may appeal to different types of investors, depending on their preference for active versus passive management.
Fees and Expenses: Fees and expenses relate to the costs associated with investment management services. Fisher Investments generally charges a tiered fee structure that decreases as account size increases. Financial Engines tends to have lower fees for a simpler service, especially for clients with defined contribution plans like 401(k)s. It’s critical for investors to assess how fees can affect overall returns over time, which can vary widely based on the chosen service.
Client Services and Support: Client services and support highlight the level of interaction and assistance clients receive. Fisher Investments boasts dedicated portfolio managers and a high-touch service model, with a focus on personalized communication. Financial Engines provides a more automated service with advice tailored through algorithms, which some investors may find less personal but more efficient. Moreover, Fisher’s approach may benefit clients who wish for more frequent and customized consultation.
Performance Track Records: Performance track records reflect how well the investment strategies have performed historically. Fisher Investments has a reputation for outperforming benchmarks over extended time frames. In contrast, Financial Engines offers performance tracking based on its target funds, which might show variability in outcomes depending on market conditions and management philosophy. Clients should review historical performance in conjunction with their investment timelines and risk tolerance.
Client Type and Suitability: Client type and suitability consider who benefits most from each service. Fisher Investments may appeal more to affluent investors seeking customized wealth management. Meanwhile, Financial Engines suits retirement savers or younger investors looking for low-cost, automated investment solutions. Personal financial goals and circumstances should drive this choice, as different client needs can significantly influence which firm is preferable.

In conclusion, careful evaluation of these factors can guide investors in making the best choice between Fisher Investments and Financial Engines based on their individual needs and financial goals.

Which Firm Is Better Suited for Your Financial Needs: Fisher Investments or Financial Engines?

Fisher Investments and Financial Engines offer different services tailored to various financial needs, making one better suited than the other based on individual circumstances.

Services Offered:
– Fisher Investments: Personalized investment management.
– Financial Engines: Automated investment management and advice.
Client Interaction:
– Fisher Investments: High-touch client service model.
– Financial Engines: Primarily digital, with limited personal interaction.
Cost Structure:
– Fisher Investments: Higher fees due to personalized services.
– Financial Engines: Typically lower fees due to automated solutions.
Investment Strategy:
– Fisher Investments: Active management with a focus on equities.
– Financial Engines: Passive investment strategies with a focus on low-cost investments.
Minimum Investment Requirements:
– Fisher Investments: Higher minimum investment amounts.
– Financial Engines: Generally lower minimums, making it accessible for more investors.
Performance Track Record:
– Fisher Investments: Historically strong performance with active management.
– Financial Engines: Limited historical performance data due to passive strategy.
Customer Base:
– Fisher Investments: Primarily high-net-worth individuals.
– Financial Engines: Broader demographic, including average investors.

These key differences highlight the unique attributes of each firm, allowing individuals to better assess which fits their financial needs.

Services Offered:
Fisher Investments specializes in personalized investment management. This service includes a tailored investment plan based on client financial goals and risk tolerance. Financial Engines offers automated investment management and advice. It utilizes algorithms to create diversified portfolios, focusing on cost-effective investments. Both firms present different approaches to investment management, catering to varied investor preferences.
Client Interaction:
Fisher Investments emphasizes a high-touch client service model. Clients engage with dedicated investment advisors, receiving ongoing support and personalized advice. Financial Engines, being primarily digital, offers limited personal interaction. Clients typically rely on online platforms for management of their portfolios, which may suit those preferring a more hands-off approach.
Cost Structure:
Fisher Investments carries higher fees due to the personalized nature of its services. These fees may include a percentage of assets under management. Financial Engines typically features lower fees. This is due to its automated approach, which reduces the need for extensive advisor platforms. Cost-conscious investors may prefer the latter’s fee structure.
Investment Strategy:
Fisher Investments employs an active management strategy. This involves making frequent trades with a focus on equities and a hands-on approach to capitalize on market opportunities. In contrast, Financial Engines favors passive investment strategies. It follows a long-term investment philosophy that focuses on low-cost index funds, which appeal to investors seeking to minimize management costs.
Minimum Investment Requirements:
Fisher Investments sets higher minimum investment requirements, appealing primarily to high-net-worth individuals. This exclusivity may limit access for average investors. Financial Engines generally imposes lower minimums, making it more accessible to a broader demographic.
Performance Track Record:
Fisher Investments has a strong performance record associated with active management. Historical data often shows outperformance compared to benchmark indices. Financial Engines, however, has limited historical performance data due to its emphasis on passive strategies. These strategies may not always outpace active management during certain market cycles.
Customer Base:
Fisher Investments primarily attracts high-net-worth individuals looking for personalized service. Its customized approach resonates with this demographic. Financial Engines caters to a more diverse client base, including average investors who are comfortable with automated services. This inclusive strategy makes it appealing to individuals new to investing.

Ultimately, the decision between Fisher Investments and Financial Engines hinges on personal preferences, investment strategy, and financial goals. Evaluating these components can help you choose the right firm aligned with your financial needs.

Related Post: